Interim advice on the use of rifampicin for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)

6 January, 2021 | ILEP Technical Commission

Interim advice on the use of rifampicin for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), in light of recent information on nitrosamine impurities in rifampicin

A number of different problems have affected the supply of rifampicin and MDT to countries this year. The most recent of these has been the discovery of impurities (nitrosamines) in rifampicin that are assumed to pose a health risk if high cumulative doses are consumed. Certain nitrosamines were found to increase the risk of cancer in long-term animal studies, although direct evidence of harm is still lacking. Nitrosamines are found in many products, e.g. various types of food, especially in baked or fried food, drinking water, tobacco smoke and rubber products. The particular impurity in rifampicin concerns a nitrosamine called MNP (1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine). This is most likely a by-product in the production of rifampicin. This compound would need to be washed out of the final drug product. Although this issue was only discovered recently due to new screening of drugs for nitrosamine recommended by WHO and other authorities, it is considered likely that nitrosamines have been present in rifampicin for years. Because this compound appears to be common to all manufacturers, they must all come up with ways to improve their processes to reduce or eliminate the impurities.

With regard to nitrosamine, it is the cumulative dose that is important, suggesting that it is not a serious issue for treatment with MDT or its use as PEP, in which the total ‘lifetime dose’ of rifampicin is low, when compared with treatment for TB (except in countries such as the US, where MDT with daily rifampicin is given for 2 years). Both the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have indicated that treatment for both TB and leprosy should continue, while the manufacturing process is revised to minimize these impurities.¹ However, no statements have been made about rifampicin use for chemoprophylaxis, while this issue obviously has an impact on all PEP programmes around the world.

The FDA currently recommends a daily limit of 5 ppm, which is has been temporarily raised from the original very conservative threshold of 0.16 ppm. Both these limits have longer-term rifampicin use in view, such as in treatment of TB where a 600mg dose of rifampicin is given daily for 6 months (in adults). We therefore consider the potential health risk posed by a single dose of rifampicin to be negligible. However, since SDR-PEP is given to healthy individuals, ethics would demand that all known risks to health be minimised.

Similar issues are being addressed in the TB field, where combination preventive treatment is used for children (age 2-5) and persons living with HIV, comprising either a 3-month regimen of daily rifampicin and isoniazid, or a 3-week, 12-dose combination of isoniazid and rifapentine (3-HP). A different nitrosamine has been found in rifapentine (1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine (CPNP)). Similar to rifampicin, an FDA statement recommends that TB treatment containing rifapentine (mostly second line treatment) be continued. A cut-off level of nitrosamine impurities has been specified below which rifapentine can be used, as for MNP in rifampicin. A large TB consortium conducting the implementation studies of the 3-HP regimen has decided to continue with the distribution using the same cut-off level as specified for treatment, considering the cumulative dose of CPNP ingested in 12 doses to pose a negligible risk.

The WHO Global TB Programme has taken up the issue of nitrosamine impurities in rifampicin and rifapentine with the WHO Pre-qualification (PQ) Team – Medicines (a global quality assurance programme for medicines). WHO PQT/MED is pursuing this with all producers of API and finished product. This is still ongoing and further guidance will be provided when this is completed. ITC is

now connected to this conversation to ensure that the use of rifampicin for SDR-PEP is also considered. The Global Leprosy Programme has advised that any actions or recommendations from our side should be aligned with those of the WHO Global TB Programme (GTB) to avoid undermining their position in the implementation of the 3-HP prophylactic regimen. We are now in conversation with the WHO GTB and WHO PQT/MED and they indicated they would be happy to tackle the rifampicin issue for TB and leprosy jointly. WHO PQT/MED is pursuing the issue of nitrosamine contamination of rifampicin with all producers of ‘active pharmaceutical ingredient’ and finished product. This is still ongoing and further guidance will be provided when this is completed. The GTB advised that “it will be prudent to wait until the PQ analyses are completed before having a firm position on this.”

The EMA is currently conducting further investigations and a risk assessment of the nitrosamine impurities and will give updated advice from time to time. The EMA has a deadline of March 31st, 2021, for providing this risk analysis for chemical medicines.

In view of the above, we will wait with any recommendations regarding SDR-PEP distribution until the various ongoing investigations and the conversation with the Global TB and PQ programmes have concluded and their position has become clear.

Where ILEP is involved in the distribution of MDT or rifampicin, we recommend that only batches be purchased and/or used that have maximum nitrosamine levels below 5ppm per day as recommended by the US FDA. Recent samples from currently available batches of MDT were tested and found to have levels of nitrosamine under this limit, so if testing is not possible at present, current stocks of MDT are deemed to be safe.

Given the challenges in MDT supply, MDT availability and supply should be taken into account when planning or implementing PEP programmes. There are two main considerations:

  1. When there is a shortage of MDT, any available rifampicin may need to be used for treatment of leprosy patients, rather than for chemoprophylaxis among contacts.
  2. Whenever active case-finding efforts are undertaken, including contact examinations, the availability of treatment for any new cases identified must be ensured (preferably MDT). MDT is essential and safe for treatment of leprosy patients. Novartis/Sandoz has resumed producing and releasing MDT batches that have been tested for nitrosamines and found to be below the safety level currently recommended by the US FDA.

Since screening for nitrosamine has not been standard in the quality control process of rifampicin, we recommend that this be included as part of all future quality control testing of rifampicin.

We recommend that ILEP offices do everything in their power to facilitate nitrosamine testing (MNP specifically) of rifampicin already available in their country that is used for SDR-PEP. WHO PQT/MED requested all manufacturers/suppliers of rifampicin or its active ingredient to undertake a risk evaluation for nitrosamine impurities by end of 2020.² Therefore, such testing should be done by each company producing rifampicin and/or by the national drug authority in charge of monitoring the quality of drugs.

ILEP Technical Commission

16 December 2020

Last updated 18 January 2021

¹https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/post-authorisation/referral-procedures/nitrosamine-impurities#rifampicin-medicines-section

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-works-mitigate-shortages-rifampin-and-rifapentine-after-manufacturers-find-nitrosamine

² https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/FAQ_Nitrosamine_18Dec2020.pdf